Skip to main content

Timeframes & Ranking

Timeframes & Risk Profiles​

QQ Omega analyzes four different timeframes, designed for different styles and risk levels:

  • Daily – Scalper (High risk / Fast decisions)

    • Data focus: intraday price and volume, funding, short-term on-chain flows, news spikes.
    • Weighting: Silicon (TA) and fast Hydrogen (on-chain) dominate, both computed on intraday and last-24h windows. Carbon and Gold are almost muted.
    • Example: a clean intraday breakout with 24h inflows can score high here even if fundamentals are only average.

  • Weekly – Tactical (Medium risk)

    • Data focus: 7d momentum, narrative persistence, net flows, positioning shifts.
    • Weighting: more balanced between Silicon and Hydrogen, evaluated on rolling 7d charts and 7d on-chain flows, with Oxygen (regime) starting to matter more.
    • Example: a coin with 7d whale accumulation and improving structure can still look strong on this horizon even with messy intraday action.

  • Monthly – Swing (Balanced)

    • Data focus: 30d trend health, unlock clusters, liquidity rotation, protocol usage.
    • Weighting: Hydrogen (usage and ownership) relies on 30d flow and activity windows. Gold (token design and unlocks) gains weight, while Silicon is reduced to a timing overlay using daily and weekly structure.
    • Example: solid 30d usage and healthy token flows can offset a noisy daily chart and weak short-term sentiment.

  • Yearly – Holder (Low frequency / Structural)

    • Data focus: fundamentals, governance, business model, long on-chain trends, macro regime backdrop.
    • Weighting: Carbon (fundamentals), Gold (tokenomics), and Oxygen (macro) dominate. Hydrogen focuses on 365d ownership and usage trends, and Silicon is used only as a coarse higher-timeframe risk check based on weekly and monthly structure.
    • Example: a project with excellent fundamentals and ownership structure can rank high here even if short-term price is under pressure.

Phosphorus reads these horizon-specific views together and surfaces profiles such as “structurally strong, tactically weak”, “structurally fragile, currently euphoric”, or “improving structurally, neutral tactically”.

Ranking Views​

For each timeframe, QQ Omega generates multiple ranking views that allow crypto assets to be evaluated from different analytical perspectives. Assets can be ordered by a global ranking based on the overall QQ Score, highlighting the strongest opportunities for a given timeframe, or by per area rankings derived from individual swarm scores, enabling specialist leaderboards focused on fundamentals through Carbon, tokenomics through Gold, on-chain behavior through Hydrogen, technical analysis through Silicon, and macro-economy through Oxygen.

This structure allows you to quickly determine which assets are strongest overall at a given moment and which assets dominate a specific analytical pillar within the same timeframe.